The British Deer Society View on Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Background
Foot and mouth disease is an acute virus disease that affects all
cloven hoofed animals. It has been recorded in reindeer, elk,
red, roe and fallow deer. A virus attack normally follows grazing
on infected pasture.
Research has shown that large wild ungulates are very resistant
to the infection (Gibbs et al, 1975). Under experimental
conditions, fallow deer exposed to the disease generally only
showed sub-clinical symptoms, although it was noted that the
virus was transmitted to domestic stock. However, the researchers
concluded that under normal conditions in the wild, deer would
not be a major factor in the spread of the infection in the event
of an epidemic amongst farm animals. Later research on foot and
mouth antibodies in fallow deer (Lawman et al, 1978) arrived at a
similar conclusion. Roe and muntjac show a more severe clinical
response to the disease.
Vectors for the Disease
There is strong circumstantial evidence that birds can play a
major role in the spread of foot and mouth disease. Amongst
mammals, hedgehogs and rats are known to be naturally susceptible
to the disease. Although there have been no recorded occurences
in wild deer in this country for over 40 years, deer on the
European continent are frequently infected and are known to act
as hosts to the disease. It is unclear how long the virus can
survive in the tissues of deer.
Control Measures
In Britain the disease is controlled in domestic stock by
slaughtering infected animals. There is clear evidence that this
policy has historically been very effective.
Vaccination of domestic stock is undertaken on the continent but
complicated by the various strains and types of the disease. We
believe vaccination is not a viable solution for our native wild
deer population. Even if the strain and type of the disease was
known, there is no feasible way a vaccine could be administered.
There is also the danger that a vaccinated animal could still be
a carrier for the disease.
MAFF are responsible for determining the
control methods to be employed on wild animals in a confirmed
foot and mouth disease area. If deer are deemed to be a threat to
the spread of the disease, we believe MAFFwould have little
option other than to order a total cull of deer. We consider such
a cull would be extremely difficult (if not impossible) to
achieve. This Society would also have some difficulty accepting
such a plan if it did not at the same time acknowledge the need
to eliminate other wild species in the infected area that might
also act as a vector for the disease.
Rural
Community | Hill Farming | Red
Deer | Burns Inquiry
News | Press Releases | Rally | Statistics | Contact